Mapped: Aerial imagery shows M25 runoff ponds have not been maintained for decades

Historic aerial imagery of runoff ponds around the M25 shows they are full of vegetation that has been growing for decades, indicating they have not been maintained by National Highways and are full of potentially hazardous sediment from road runoff.

This is despite guidance recommending they be cleared every 10 to 15 years and National Highways having “a statutory duty to ensure that discharges from its network doesn’t cause pollution for the surrounding environment”, according to the government.

An investigation by NCE using data from a Freedom of Information Act response combined with historical imagery from Google Earth found that many of the 94 ponds around the M25 designed to be regularly emptied have not been maintained for decades.

The data from the FOI response showed that the roads body did not have or would not reveal information relating to the last time 87 of the 94 ponds had been maintained. This means that they are less effective in preventing floods and are likely filling up with hazardous chemicals from road runoff, which could be entering watercourses. Academics and NGOs with experience in this field told NCE that National Highways is likely not investigating them in order to avoid liabilities.

Stormwater Shepherds is a not-for-profit working to improve the health of waterways and its  director of operations UK Jo Bradley said: “The runoff ponds that were built at the time that the M25 was built [1960s to 1970s] will be flood storage ponds, built to attenuate flows off the motorway, to manage the peak flow of the runoff during rain events and to manage the volume of runoff entering local streams and rivers.

“However, their role in pollution control was recognised and well understood. The guidance published in 1993 contained design details relating to pollution capture and retention, and described the function and design of oil separators.

“They are important because the construction of a motorway changes the hydraulic behaviour of rainfall across the catchment by introducing a large impermeable area, increasing flood risk, and often draining all the rainfall to one discharge point.

“This would lead to increased flood risk, increased pollution and increased risk of erosion and physical harm to the river unless these ponds/reservoirs were installed.”

In May 2024, Stormwater Shepherds and CIWEM (the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management) published a report which found National Highways and other highways authorities in England have no permits in place for managing the pollutants which are washed off their roads.

The report described road runoff as “hazardous”. It said: “Research by the Environment Agency and [National Highways] has identified a number of pollutants commonly found in highway runoff: copper, zinc, cadmium, fluoranthene, pyrene and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

“These are identified as specific pollutants, priority substances or priority hazardous substances (substances of major concern for European waters due to their toxicity, bio-accumulating properties and/or persistence in the environment that under the Water Framework Directive and its regulations should be progressively reduced or eliminated from surface water).”

Locations of the M25 runoff ponds

Using coordinates provided by National Highways in its FoI response, NCE can reveal the locations of the 94 attenuation ponds aroudn the M25 and through historic aerial imagery the construction dates within certain time period, and maintenance or lack thereof, can be identified.

Below is a map showing the locations of all the ponds listed by National Highways. The full location dataset is at the bottom of this article.

It’s unclear why there is a gap in the north part of the highway and there are some ponds visible on Google Earth around the M25 which look similar to the ones labelled which were not included in the list sent to NCE.

In her analysis of the state of the ponds based on historic satellite imagery, Bradley highlighted the Ciria (Construction Industry Research and Information Association) B14 document: Design of Flood Storage Reservoirs.

The document states: “Sediment removal from within the reservoir or adjacent to inlet zones should be timed so as to cause minimum disturbance to wildlife, and ideally should be undertaken in stages over a few years to allow recolonisation from the undisturbed areas; plants removed during maintenance should be transplanted whenever possible.

“Sediment dredging should take place every 10-15 years.”

Bradley said the Ciria document “was the Bible for designing flood management ponds”.

“That’s what [National Highways] should have been working to; 10 to 15 years maintenance intervals,” she added.

Bradley said features like sediment forebays in or near ponds, and the ponds themselves “would have been constructed and designed with a calculated volume”.

“An engineer would have said ‘Okay, this is the flow rate. This is the residence time that we need behind the sediment forebay, or this is the volume that we need in the sediment forebay’ and they would have worked that out,” she explained.

However, the images of overgrowth on the ponds suggests that these calculations have not been used to inform their monitoring or maintenance requirements.

Beggars Lane pond

The pond at Beggars Lane, which is between junctions 5 and 6 near Westerham in Kent, starts in 1960 as a triangular shaped body but vegetation starts to encroach over the years because of the ingress of sediment from the outfall from the M25.

“That pond is no longer functioning as it was designed to function,” Bradley said.

“Because it had a functional volume that was calculated by the engineer and it no longer functions with that functional value. Now, you could argue that it still did a good job because the vegetation will capture and treat a lot of the pollution and that’s true.

“But that’s not how it was designed to function and nobody’s monitoring it to see if it’s still functioning.

“They’re not being maintained in accordance with their design, [Beggars Lane pond has] not been maintained for years, and they’re supposed to be maintained every 10 to 15 years. And so, although they are still functioning to an extent, there’s no evidence [regarding] whether or not they’re functioning to an acceptable extent. They are not functioning as they were designed to function.

“There’s hundreds and hundreds of tons of [unwanted material] in there that somebody should be taking away and treating, but they’re just not doing it.”

A black and white photo of fields

Beggars Lane, December 1960

A substantial body of water set in green trees and grassland next to the M25

Beggars Lane, December 1990

A substantial body of water set in green trees and grassland next to the M25

Beggars Lane, December 2003

An aerial photo of forest next to the M25

Beggars Lane, September 2018

An aerial photo of forest and a small body of water next to the M25

Beggars Lane, May 2024

New Pond

New Pond is between junction 13 and 14, near Heathrow Airport.

Judging from the historic imagery, Bradley said the pond “seems to have just completely filled with vegetation”.

There are several different features visible at and near the pond, one of which appears to be a sediment trap, but Bradley said “if that’s supposed to be sediment trap that isn’t working anymore”.

More historic images available on Google Earth of New Pond show activities taking place around the feature, including some clearances, but in the present day, vegetation appears to be thriving, which indicates the presence of large volumes of sediment.

Explaining why some but not all of the vegetation could have been removed, Bradley said: “Sometimes [National Highways commissions] condition surveys, more from an ecological point of view than anything else.

“Sometimes they might go in and go ‘There’s an invasive weed we need to clean the invasive weed’. Or they might go in and say, ‘We need to take this vegetation back to make it a better habitat’.

“The contractor who does the condition survey might come back and say ‘We need to do this piece of work and it’ll cost you £50,000’,” and Bradley said National Highways was likely to commission some work but not others, due to costs.

A black and white photo of fields

New Pond, December 1945

New Pond, September 1999

New Pond, December 2002

New Pond, July 2004

New Pond, June 2005

New Pond, December 2006 (1)

New Pond, December 2006 (2 - zoomed in)

A newly constructed pond next to the M25

New Pond, September 2008

New Pond, June 2013

New Pond, May 2024

Blackdale Fann Pond

The images show the construction and use of Blackdale Fann Pond, which is near Blackdale Farm and sits between junctions 1b and 2 near Dartford, south of the River Thames.

Asked why the pond looks black next to other bodies of water nearby which are a different colour, Bradley said it’s because of “contaminated sediments”.

“It’s just full because the separators haven’t been emptied and they’re huge,” she added. “So they’re going to cost a lot of money to empty and the pond is full of motorway sediment. That’s why it’s that colour.”

Open fields next to the M25

Blackdale Fann Pond, December 2003

A white scar on the land next to the M25 suggestive of construction activity

Blackdale Fann Pond under construction, November 2006

Blackdale Fann Pond, September 2012

Blackdale Fann Pond, May 2024

Response from public bodies

National Highways repeated the response it had provided for the story NCE published earlier in July 2024.

National Highways director of environmental sustainability Stephen Elderkin said: “We are committed to addressing the risk of pollution from road runoff. Our Water Quality Plan 2030 sets out a high-level programme of work to achieve this. We’ve also invested in a programme of research to understand the risk of pollution from microplastics in road runoff.

“High quality road infrastructure can support positive environmental outcomes, and that is at the heart of our work in this area.”

National Highways is a executive non-departmental public body of the Department for Transport.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said National Highways “has a statutory duty to ensure that discharges from its network doesn’t cause pollution for the surrounding environment”.

The spokesperson also pointed to the fact that monitoring of environmental quality standards (EQS) and decisions on permitting are a matter for the Environment Agency.

EQS are limit values set by regulation to manage the concentrations of defined harmful substances, and for water quality, these are set by the Water Framework Directive which is a piece of EU legislation transposed into UK law.

Samples collected from three strategic road network outfalls and six local authority highway outfalls and analysed by CIWEM and Stormwater Shepherds found that discharges from the outfalls “fail the EQS for several PAHs (polyaromatic hydrocarbons)” which “consistently exceeded their maximum allowable concentrations”.

In one instance it was found that PAH concentrations were 730 times higher than the allowed limit.

PAHs are “priority hazardous substances under the Water Framework Directive, which identifies them as substances shown to be of major concern for European waters due to their toxicity, bio-accumulating properties and/or persistence in the environment,” according to the report.

The Environment Agency comes under the remit of the Department for Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (Defra).

Defra did not respond to a request for comment.

Other ponds showing a lack of vegetation clearance

Below you can find a series of images of other ponds which have clearly not been emptied of sediment because of the presence of vegetation.

The Ciria document and Bradley’s analysis indicate that they are all not being maintained according to the relevant guidance, instead being left to fill up with potentially hazardous waste.

Spur Road Pond

Spur Road Pond is between Junction 4 and the junction with the A21 near the village of Badgers Mount in Kent.

A newly constructed pond next to the M25

Spur Road Pond, December 1990

Spur Road Pond, May 2024

Godstone Roundabout, Godstone Pond No. 1 and Godstone Pond No. 2

The Godstone ponds are all located on or just east of Junction 6 near the village of Godstone in Surrey.

Godstone Roundabout, Godstone Pond No. 1 and Godstone Pond No. 2, December 2008

An aerial photo of forest next to the M25

Godstone Roundabout, Godstone Pond No. 1 and Godstone Pond No. 2, June 2021

Pavilion Pond and Flooding Pond

They are between Junctions 10 and 11 near the village of Byfleet in Surrey

Two newly constructed ponds next to the M25

Pavilion Pond and Flooding Pond, December 1999

Pavilion Pond and Flooding Pond, May 2024

Santerbury Offslip Pond and Santerbury Onslip Pond

These are at Junction 1A south of the Dartford Crossing in Kent.

A newly constructed pond next to the M25

Santerbury Offslip Pond and Santerbury Onslip Pond, December 1990

Santerbury Offslip Pond and Santerbury Onslip Pond, May 2024

Alderbourne Pond

Alderbourne Pond is near Junction 16 near Pinewood Studios which is in Buckinghamshire.

A substantial body of water set in green trees and grassland next to the M25

Alderbourne Pond, September 1999

An aerial photo of forest next to the M25

Alderbourne Pond, May 2024

Interceptor 78/0A and Interceptor 78/0B

The Interceptor 78/0A and Interceptor 78/0B ponds are between junctions 10 and 11 in Surrey.

Two newly constructed ponds next to the M25

Interceptor 78/0A and Interceptor 78/0B, December 1999

Interceptor 78/0A and Interceptor 78/0B, May 2024

London Road

London Road pond is near the village of Otford in Kent, between junctions 4 and 5.

A newly constructed pond next to the M25

London Road, December 1990

An aerial photo of forest next to the M25

London Road, May 2024

Pavillion Pond and Flooding Pond

The ponds are between junctions 10 and 11 in Surrey.

Two newly constructed ponds next to the M25

Pavillion Pond and Flooding Pond, December 1999

Pavillion Pond and Flooding Pond, May 2024

Full location data regarding the ponds sent to NCE by National Highways under the Freedom of Information Act:

Asset name (Pond) Pond Asset
Reference
Pond Condition
Inspection Date
Easting
(region
node)
Northing
(region
node)
Last Sediment Removal
* Maintenance Year (or
not yet required
Catherine Borne TL2101_6154a 31/03/2023 521614.84 201542 01/03/2023
Warwick Wold Pond TQ3152_4297b 22/06/2022 531423.71 152970.3 2022
River Mole East TQ1458_0438a 29/06/2022 514040.58 158380.6 2022
Flint Cottages No. 1 TL0701_7432a 21/08/2023 507746.12 201322.1 2023
Godstone Roundabout TQ3552_1777a 07/06/2023 535172.8 152771.6 2024
River Mole West TQ1358_8835b 29/06/2022 513880.75 158356 2024
Stubbs Pond TQ0798_0395b 21/08/2023 507034.47 198950.5 Due 2023, delayed
Pond 1835 TQ5781_5895a 01/06/2022 557576.08 181950.6 Not yet required
Interceptor 78/0B TQ0463_9216c 05/02/2023 504921.38 163163.7 Not yet required
New Pond TQ0374_3696b 05/03/2023 503359.58 174962.4 Not yet required
Santerbury Onslip Pond TQ5574_8291b 05/06/2022 555826.43 174914.7 Not yet required
Pond 1812 TQ5884_2912a 05/06/2022 558292.52 184125.6 Not yet required
Summit Farm 1 TQ5471_9816b 05/11/2022 554986.37 171161.1 Not yet required
Hawley Road Infiltration Pond TQ5471_9495a 05/11/2022 554939.35 171952 Not yet required
IUS Pond 4B TQ0291_1718a 08/04/2022 502168.37 191182.6 Not yet required
IUS Pond 5 TQ0292_4794a 08/04/2022 502471.77 192946.7 Not yet required
IUS Pond 1698 TQ5494_8504a 08/07/2023 554862.48 194036.1 Not yet required
IUS Pond 1683 TQ5395_8617a 08/07/2023 553860.34 195169.3 Not yet required
IUS Pond 1727 TQ5692_8711a 08/07/2023 556874.76 192118.5 Not yet required
IUS Basin 1605 TQ4799_6768a 08/07/2023 547666.51 199689.3 Not yet required
IUS Basin 1609 TQ4799_9447a 08/07/2023 547953.68 199466.3 Not yet required
Pond 1824 TQ5783_8821a 08/07/2023 557893.51 183214.6 Not yet required
IUS Pond 8 TQ0497_2344a 08/11/2022 504234.46 197440.9 Not yet required
IUS Pond 31A TL2101_7125a 08/11/2022 521711 201252.3 Not yet required
IUS Pond 31B TL2101_6835c 08/11/2022 521682.32 201351.2 Not yet required
Black Horse Lane TL2102_0717a 08/11/2022 521068.88 202177.7 Not yet required
London Road TQ5058_6653b 13/05/2022 550664.16 158536.9 Not yet required
IUS Pond 22 (NEW) TL1402_9246a 15/08/2022 514923.49 202466.7 Not yet required
IUS Pond 21 TL1402_4442a 15/08/2022 514445.27 202412.5 Not yet required
IUS Pond 25 - NEW TL1602_6769a 15/08/2022 516671.39 202697.9 Not yet required
Soakaway Six (The Stacks) TL1103_5112c 15/08/2022 511528.98 203130.4 Not yet required
Soakaway Three (The Stacks) TL1103_7917e 15/08/2022 511793.61 203173.1 Not yet required
Soakaway One (The Stacks) TL1103_8817f 15/08/2022 511889.13 203175.9 Not yet required
Woodys Dell TQ0598_8318a 16/08/2022 505832.75 198185.9 Not yet required
Quarry Pond TQ0799_3017a 16/08/2022 507302.59 199175.8 Not yet required
Amersham Road Pond TQ0187_6253a 16/08/2022 501633.6 187529.4 Not yet required
Chevening Lagoon TQ4856_9453a 17/06/2022 548938.49 156534.8 Not yet required
IUS Pond 1791 TQ5886_7937a 17/08/2023 558785.99 186373.5 Not yet required
IUS Pond 1763 TQ5888_3993a 18/07/2023 558395.28 188934.2 Not yet required
IUS Pond 1776 TQ5887_8666a 18/07/2023 558862.35 187665.2 Not yet required
Mill Pond TQ4655_4759n 19/05/2023 546471.36 155589.6 Not yet required
King George Field TQ5571_4057d 21/06/2023 555403.45 171570.9 Not yet required
Summit Farm 2 TQ5471_8807b 21/06/2023 554880.83 171072.6 Not yet required
IUS Pond 16 TL1002_5286a 21/08/2023 510511.57 202857.2 Not yet required
IUS Pond 15 TL0802_9876a 21/08/2023 508990.72 202769.2 Not yet required
Flint Cottages No. 2 TL0701_7320b 21/08/2023 507731.4 201200.4 Not yet required
Brasted Gate TQ4655_4471a 22/06/2022 546447.5 155714 Not yet required
Beggars Lane TQ4555_3912a 22/06/2022 545392.67 155125.8 Not yet required
Santerbury Offslip Pond TQ5575_8105c 24/08/2023 555814.91 175057.8 Not yet required
IUS Pond 3 TQ0188_5522a 25/08/2023 501554.15 188214.9 Not yet required
Blackdale Fann Pond TQ5572_4245a 27/05/2022 555413.43 172452.1 Not yet required
Interceptor 78/0A TQ0463_8813d 27/06/2022 504879.58 163132.8 Not yet required
Interceptor 78/2B TQ0463_8723b 27/06/2022 504875.81 163238.4 Not yet required
Allotment Gardens TQ0562_1861c 27/06/2022 505180.12 162620.4 Not yet required
QE2 Pond TQ5777_5246d 29/08/2023 557524.91 177467 Not yet required
Brook Pond TQ5782_9295b 29/08/2023 557919.56 182953.4 Not yet required
IUS Pond23 TL1502_2553b First visit due 2024 515261.01 202536.8 Not yet required
IUS Pond 27B TL1803_7719c First visit due 2024 518773.05 203191.6 Not yet required
IUS Pond 27A TL1903_1937a Unknown 519193.93 203383.1 Not yet required
M25 84/4A TQ0168_5853a 05/02/2023 501588.4 168533.7 Not yet required.
86/5A TQ0170_5359a 05/02/2023 501529.67 170601.6 Not yet required.
Pavillion Pond TQ0561_5459b 05/02/2023 505547.66 161592.6 Not yet required.
Flooding Pond TQ0561_5537b 05/02/2023 505553.25 161377.6 Not yet required.
Interceptor 76/6A TQ0561_5393b 05/02/2023 505534.47 161926.2 Not yet required.
66/0 TQ1358_8529a 05/02/2023 513859.37 158294.1 Not yet required.
86/9A TQ0171_5106a 05/03/2023 501516.21 171061.2 Not yet required.
Godstone Pond No. 2 TQ3552_3380b 07/06/2023 535335.82 152802.5 Not yet required.
Interceptor 85/3A TQ0169_5440a 08/04/2022 501547.73 169405.6 Not yet required.
Spur Road Pond TQ4962_0492b 08/11/2023 549041.84 162922 Not yet required.
Godstone Pond No. 1 TQ3552_3377b 13/05/2022 535333.63 152776.5 Not yet required.
TQ3753_9261a TQ3753_9261a 1st visit due 2024 537940.67 153578.3 Not yet required.
TQ3753_9260a TQ3753_9260a 1st visit due 2024 537925.09 153603.5 Not yet required.
TQ0167_8969b TQ0167_8969b 1st visit due 2024 501897.89 167692.9 Not yet required.
M20 Fast Entry Link TQ5368_3693b 21/06/2023 553359.97 168936.3 Not yet required.
Redhill Bottom TQ2853_9470b 22/06/2022 528943.91 153709 Not yet required.
Gatton Bottom TQ2753_9268b 22/06/2022 527929 153684.8 Not yet required.
Pointers Pond TQ0859_2920b 25/08/2023 508294.73 159206.9 Not yet required.
Costal Pond TQ2154_3069b 25/08/2023 521302.61 154696.7 Not yet required.
Alderbourne Pond TQ0185_8755a 25/08/2023 501876.78 185552.1 Not yet required.
TQ0659_3386a TQ0659_3386a 25/08/2023 506335.72 159861.4 Not yet required.
Swanley Pond 1 TQ5267_8788b 27/05/2022 552870.25 167886.5 Not yet required.
Interceptor 74/4A TQ0659_1988b 27/06/2022 506195.13 159885.7 Not yet required.
Interceptor 65/8A TQ1458_0432c 27/06/2022 514048.35 158322.4 Not yet required.
Interceptor 84/5B TQ0168_6655a 28/06/2022 501659.51 168556 Not yet required.
Interceptor 86/4B TQ0170_6050a 28/06/2022 501582.3 170651.7 Not yet required.
Interceptor 87/4A TQ0171_6843c 28/06/2022 501687.03 171438.7 Not yet required.
87/0B TQ0171_5809b 28/06/2022 501587.36 171096.3 Not yet required.
West Hall Pond TQ0560_9411a 28/06/2022 505939.58 160119.1 Not yet required.
Leatherhead Lagoon TQ1658_6939a 29/06/2022 516690.37 158398.4 Not yet required.
Leatherhead Lagoon (second TQ1658_6547b 29/06/2022 516657.06 158477.4 Not yet required.
M25 86/3A TQ0170_5829a 29/06/2022 501580.38 170305.6 Not yet required.
Interceptor 73/6B TQ0659_8261a 29/06/2022 506819.88 159610.1 Not yet required.
Muggeridge Wood TQ1257_7297a 29/06/2022 512720.54 157973.1 Not yet required.
Pond 50/5A TQ2652_7497a First visit due 2024 526738.89 152967.9 Not yet required.
*Not all ponds require sediment removal due to the design of upstream silt capture devices. Sediment removal is based on condition inspection results.

 

Like what you've read? To receive New Civil Engineer's daily and weekly newsletters click here.

Have your say

or a new account to join the discussion.